Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Watson-Sajna v. RTG Furniture Corp. of Georgia et al
as 2:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Joyce Watson-Sajna
Defendant:
RTG Furniture Corp. of Georgia doing business as Rooms To Go and Logan Virginia Properties, LLC doing business as Rooms To Go
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Austin v. RoomsToGo.com, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02910
Plaintiff:
Ophelia Austin
Defendant:
RoomsToGo.com, Inc. and RTG Furniture Corp. of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
RTG FURNITURE CORP OF GEORGIA v. SKIPPY FINANCE LLC
as 4:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
RTG FURNITURE CORP OF GEORGIA
Defendant:
SKIPPY FINANCE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv60510
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Coding Technologies, LLC v. RTG Furniture Corp. et al
as 8:2017cv02403
Plaintiff:
Coding Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
RTG Furniture Corp. and Roomstogo.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Arevalo v. RTG Furniture Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv04035
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Arevalo
Defendant:
RTG Furniture Corp. of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. RTG Furniture Corp. et al
as 8:2012cv01783
Plaintiff:
Lisa Richardson
Defendant:
RTG Furniture Corp. and John Dunlap
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Richardson v. RTG Furniture Corp. et al
as 8:2012cv01451
Plaintiff:
Lisa Richardson
Defendant:
RTG Furniture Corp. and John R. Dunlap
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
