Cases 21 - 30 of 31
GILBERT v. CITY OF GREENSBURG et al
as 1:2012cv00816
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENSBURG, BRIAN HEATON and RUDY PEREZ
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER GILBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holland v. Gary City of et al
as 2:2012cv00062
Plaintiff:
Robert Holland
Defendant:
Gary City of, Scott King, Hamilton Carmouche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. Gary The City of et al
as 2:2010cv00454
Plaintiff:
Robert Holland
Defendant:
Gary The City of, Rudy Clay, Gary City of Chief of Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STANKO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) et al
as 2:2010cv00253
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP), JOHN DOES 1X THROUGH 6X, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Plaintiff:
RUDY STANKO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
STANKO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) et al
as 4:2010cv00109
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP), JOHN DOES 1X THROUGH 6X, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Plaintiff:
RUDY STANKO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
STANKO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) et al
as 4:2010cv00096
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP), HARLEY LAPPIN, CHARLES LOCKETT and others
Plaintiff:
RUDY STANKO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
STANKO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2010cv00201
Plaintiff:
RUDY STANKO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
STANKO v. OBAMA et al
as 3:2010cv00105
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, CHARLES LOCKET, MICHAEL MCNALLEY and others
Plaintiff:
RUDY STANKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gibbs-EL v Lozano
as 4:2010cv00063
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Gibbs-El
Defendant:
Rudy Lozano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STANKO v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2010cv00112
Defendant:
L. BREESE, MAUREEN CRUZ, BLAKE DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
RUDY STANKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
