Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00872
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02530
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Saenz-Lugo v. Unknown Parties
as 2:2013cv02115
Defendant:
Unknown Parties
Plaintiff:
Rudy Patron Saenz-Lugo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saenz-Lugo v. Gates et al
as 2:2013cv01358
Plaintiff:
Rudy Patron Saenz-Lugo
Defendant:
Christopher Gates and Dustin Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Coates et al v. Santa Cruz, County of et al
as 4:2012cv00068
Plaintiff:
Wayne Coates and Patricia Wiercinski
Defendant:
Santa Cruz, County of , Keith Barth , Beth Barth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson et al v. Bill Johnson's Restaurants Incorporated Defined Benefit Plan et al
as 2:2011cv01605
Plaintiff:
Johnny Johnson , Anna Johnson , Rudy Johnson and others
Defendant:
Bill Johnson's Restaurants Incorporated Defined Benefit Plan, Harrell Dean Cameron , Unknown Cameron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Rose
as 4:2011mc00005
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Rudy Rose
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
