Cases 41 - 50 of 168
RUIZ v. BERRYHILL
as 5:2018cv05456
Plaintiff:
TATIANA RUIZ
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TROVY et al v. BAYER U.S. LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01438
Plaintiff:
NORMA RHYMES, AMANDA LAWSON, MARLENE RUIZ and others
Defendant:
BAYER AG, BAYER U.S. LLC, BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RUIZ-HERRERA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2018cv04597
Plaintiff:
LUIS FERNANDEZ RUIZ-HERRERA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03627
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
RUIZ-FIGUEROA v. CLARK et al
as 5:2018cv02975
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL CLARK and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LEHIGH COUNTY
Petitioner:
RAFAEL RUIZ-FIGUEROA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED AND TWENTY DOLLARS IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY ($75,720.00)
as 2:2018cv02591
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED AND TWENTY DOLLARS IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY ($75,720.00)
Claimant:
JOSE R. BONILLA RUIZ
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00179
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
RUIZ v. GILMORE et al
as 5:2018cv00880
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER RUIZ
Respondent:
ROBERT GILMORE, PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BERKS COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GONZALEZ et al v. CARDOSO
as 2:2018cv00598
Plaintiff:
JUAN GONZALEZ and JANNET RUIZ
Defendant:
DAVID ARELLANO CARDOSO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruiz v. Gilmore et al
as 3:2017cv02229
Petitioner:
Christopher Ruiz
Respondent:
Robert Gilmore and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
