Cases 1 - 10 of 12
RUMPLE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv01589
Plaintiff:
TRISTIA M. RUMPLE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Messina v. Kosciusko County Sheriff et al
as 3:2020cv00988
Defendant:
LINDSAY BROUYETTE, TRAVIS NICHOLAS, MARIAH RUMPLE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MESSINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04101
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
RUMPLE v. COOK INCORPORATED el al
as 1:2017cv03016
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
317) 237-1000 (fax:
John T. Schlafer, John T. Schlafer and John T. Schlafer
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP RUMPLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
MOON v. LOCKETT, et al.
as 2:2014cv00068
Defendant:
BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL W. MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOON v. JOYNER et al
as 1:2013cv02012
Defendant:
BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOON v. LOCKETT
as 1:2013cv02010
Defendant:
BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
STEVENS v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2013cv00038
Defendant:
CRAIG APKER, BRACE, DOE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. STEVENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOON v. LOCKETT et al
as 1:2012cv00771
Defendant:
OFFICER BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, OFFICER BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
