Cases 31 - 40 of 71
HALL v. SAMUELS et al
as 2:2014cv00348
Defendant:
D. ALLRED, BOND HOLDERS/ISSUERS DOES 1-5, J. F. CARAWAY and others
Plaintiff:
MARC PIERRE HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Emerson v. Samuels et al
as 4:2014cv02359
Plaintiff:
Sherman Emerson
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Matthew Tussey, J Lotz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITNEY v. WALKER
as 2:2014cv00278
Defendant:
BIGLEY, CONNIE COPELAND, GARDENER and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN WHITNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOLDEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) et al
as 2:2014cv00103
Defendant:
MELISSA BAYLESS, WARDEN JOHN CARAWAY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. BOLDEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
EDDINGTON v. SAMUELS, JR. et al
as 1:2014cv00463
Defendant:
J. BEIGHLEY, J. F. CARAWAY, DANNA DOBBINS and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY EDDINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOON v. LOCKETT, et al.
as 2:2014cv00068
Defendant:
BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL W. MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOON v. JOYNER et al
as 1:2013cv02012
Defendant:
BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOON v. LOCKETT
as 1:2013cv02010
Defendant:
BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
NORTH v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2013cv00427
Defendant:
BIXLER, BRACE, TRACY HEISER and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY NORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
NIXON v. CARAWAY et al
as 2:2013cv00380
Respondent:
4 OTHER JOHN DOE, BAILY, J. F. CARAWAY and others
Petitioner:
GARY E. NIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
