Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Agyeah v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2021cv40020
Defendant:
Edward M. Augustus, Jr., Michael W. McGrath, Michael F. Ryder and others
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Agyeah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv30185
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Paris v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2018cv40169
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Officers John Doe 1-4, Nathan Reando and others
Plaintiff:
Michael J Paris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. Autozoners, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01253
Plaintiff:
Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
Defendant:
Autozoners, LLC and Matthew Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Damage
Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. Autozoners, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv12531
Plaintiff:
Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
Defendant:
Autozoners, LLC and Matthew Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Damage
Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. Autozoners, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv12531
Plaintiff:
Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
Defendant:
Autozoners, LLC and Matthew Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Deschenes v. Ryder et al
as 1:2016cv11460
Plaintiff:
Shannon Deschenes
Defendant:
Andrew Ryder, Francisco Rodriques and New Bedford, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vega-Santiago v. Ryder et al
as 4:2015cv40097
Plaintiff:
Edwin Vega-Santiago
Defendant:
Michael Ryder , James Guittar , Gary J. Gemme and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2013cv40064
Plaintiff:
Jerome E. Smith
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Gary J. Gemme, Terrence Cahill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Colarusso v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv10853
Plaintiff:
Robert Colarusso , Jr.
Defendant:
Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., Ryder System, Inc., Daimler Trucks North America, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
