Cases 1 - 10 of 181
RUSH v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
ANTWAN RUSH
Defendant:
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CHRISTINA CONYERS and RACHELLE BROWER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
PATTERSON v. I.D.O.C et al
as 1:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
AARON PATTERSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C, CENTURION MEDICAL GROUP, J. HADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Yates et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Rachel Yates and Sevante Yates
Defendant:
United States of America and Known Defendant A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
WARREN v. CHAMBERS et al
as 1:2023cv01964
Plaintiff:
LARRY WARREN
Defendant:
LONI YOLANDA CHAMBERS, DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORR v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01830
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, ROBERT CARTER, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 w Fed. Question: Wrongful Termination of Employment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
