Cases 31 - 40 of 489
POWELL et al v. T. MARZETTI COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv01139
Plaintiff:
BLAINE M. POWELL and RACHEL POWELL
Defendant:
T. MARZETTI COMPANY and LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Monighan et al v. Christopher et al
as 1:2023cv00885
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Monighan, Brodie Monighan, Lydia Monighan and others
Defendant:
David E. Christopher, Gregory Millbrand, Chad Runkel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DIXON v. SEMINO et al
as 1:2023cv00145
Defendant:
JODY E. WINDER, GINA SEMINO, C.O. CARLOS and others
Not Classified By Court:
JIMITA RACHEL DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Thompson
as 3:2023cv00713
Petitioner:
Ronald Allen Wright
Respondent:
Rachel Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP, INC.
as 2:2023cv01603
Defendant:
RACHEL CECIL and RACHEL SPONSELLER
Plaintiff:
HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
WATSON v. BRISTOL WEST INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv01467
Plaintiff:
RACHELLE WATSON
Defendant:
BRISTOL WEST INSURANCE COMPANY and BRISTOL WEST INSURANCE COMPANY doing business as BRISTOL WEST INSURANCE GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Wright v. Thompson
as 3:2023cv00589
Petitioner:
Ronald Allen Wright
Respondent:
Rachel Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stair v. Kajikazi
as 5:2023cv01265
Petitioner:
Rachel Stair
Respondent:
Kilolo Kajikazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
STAIR v. KAJIKAZI
as 5:2023cv01269
Plaintiff:
RACHEL STAIR
Defendant:
KILOLO KAJIKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
STAIR
as 5:2023cv01268
Petitioner:
RACHEL STAIR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
