Cases 41 - 50 of 489
VERDI et al v. TORAX MEDICAL, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
ERIC VERDI and RACHEL VERDI
Defendant:
TORAX MEDICAL, INC. and ETHICON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DIXON et al v. SUTTER et al
as 1:2023cv00044
Defendant:
JIMITA R. DIXON, KEVIN SUTTER, WARDEN KEVIN SUTTER and others
Plaintiff:
JIMITA RACHEL DIXON and ANASTASIA CULLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. SUTTER
as 1:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
JIMITA R. DIXON and JIMITA RACHEL DIXON
Defendant:
KEVIN SUTTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LENGLE et al v. ESPEJO
as 5:2023cv00697
Plaintiff:
RACHEL LENGLE and TODD LENGLE
Defendant:
PABLO RAMIREZ ESPEJO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
KILLINGER v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
RACHEL KILLINGER
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
AKBAR v. CAMPBEL
as 2:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
MANANI AKBAR
Defendant:
DIRECTOR RACHEL CAMPBEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Yohn v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Rachel Rebecca Yohn
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Rankins v. Gourley et al
as 1:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
William Rankins
Defendant:
Michael Gourley, Bradley Ritchey and Rachel Misiti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rafiq v. Thompson
as 1:2023cv00086
Petitioner:
Shabbar Rafiq
Respondent:
Rachel Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KLEIN-KATZ v. PRO CUSTOM SOLAR, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Rachel Klein-Katz
Defendant:
Pro Custom Solar, LLC d/b/a Momentum Solar, LLC, Arthur Souritzidis, Cameron Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
