Cases 1 - 10 of 187
Meyer v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Madison Meyer
Defendant:
County of San Diego, Kayla Valenzuela, Catherine Craft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
RADI v. MARSHALL
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ALICE RADI
Defendant:
JUDGE DENISE MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RADI v. MARSHALL
as 1:2024cv00609
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ALICE RADI
Defendant:
DENISE MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Amanda Wilde v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Amanda Wilde
Defendant:
County of Orange, Orange County Social Services, Child Protective Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez et al v. Nienow et al
as 3:2023cv02338
Plaintiff:
Brenda Martinez, Pedro Bernal, A.B. and others
Defendant:
M.D. Shalon Nienow, M.D. Sarah Vega, M.D. Natalie Laub and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
RADIE v. LYFT, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv04507
Plaintiff:
MELISSA RADIE
Defendant:
LYFT, INC. and PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Rady v. Panamerican Consulting, LLC
as 1:2023cv15170
Plaintiff:
Melanie Rady
Defendant:
Panamerican Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
ITTEM-RADY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv14991
Plaintiff:
LINDA S ITTEM-RADY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
