Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Acosta v United States of America, et al
as 5:2021cv00385
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL ACOSTA
Defendant:
Elizabeth Muniz Rodriguez, Elizabeth Eliamar Rodriguez and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
RAMOS v. IMEXCA, CORP. et al
as 1:2020cv24110
Plaintiff:
YARLIN RAMOS
Defendant:
IMEXCA, CORP. doing business as DEAL AIRPORT PARKING and RAFAEL ACOSTA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
US v. Acosta-Joaquin
as 17-1379
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
CARLOS RAFAEL ACOSTA-JOAQUIN, a/k/a Kelvin Valle-Alicea
BRITO et alv. ENCHANTED ISLAND, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv24667
Defendant:
ENCHANTED ISLAND, LLC , Rafael Acosta and MAGNOLIA POLIDO
Plaintiff:
BRANDA RIVERA BRITO , Elizet CAMACHO and Juan Carlos Carrion Colon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ACOSTA v. Old Navy, LLC et al
as 4:2014cv03408
Plaintiff:
Rafael Acosta
Defendant:
Old Navy, LLC , Kalmot Corporation , Robert White, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. ACOSTA
as 2:2014cv03231
Plaintiff:
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
RAFAEL ACOSTA
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Acosta v. Schrader et al
as 1:2013cv00302
Plaintiff:
Rafael Acosta
Defendant:
Justine Schrader , Sandoval County Detention Center and Al Casamento
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Acosta et al v. Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest
as 8:2011cv02527
Plaintiff:
Rafael Acosta and Mayda C. Acosta
Defendant:
Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. et al v. High Impact Design & Entertainment, et al
as 2:2007cv01115
Plaintiff:
Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. and Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Limited Ltd.
Defendant:
High Impact Design & Entertainment, William Randall Adams and Rafael Acosta
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
