Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Blais Cunningham & Crowe Chester, LLP v. Patel et al
as 3:2024cv00882
Plaintiff:
Blais Cunningham & Crowe Chester, LLP and Blais Title & Escrow, LLC
Defendant:
Rahul Patel, Adnan Akhtar, Gregory Dabney and others
Interested Party:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Li v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2021cv00996
Plaintiff:
Dongmei Li
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Public Health, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Patel
as 3:2021cv00994
Defendant:
Rahulkumar M Patel and Rahul Patel
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Black Diamond Consulting Group LLC v. Moolex LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00722
Defendant:
Levy Abdurakhmanov, Jane Doe, Rahul Chaturvedi and others
Plaintiff:
Black Diamond Consulting Group LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01390
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Manchanda v. Emons et al
as 3:2017cv00127
Plaintiff:
Rahul Manchanda
Defendant:
Jane Emons , Cheryl Weir-Reeves , James Kenefick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dhir v. Carlyle Group et al
as 5:2016cv00219
Defendant:
Carlyle Group, Vermillion Asset Management, chris nygaard and others
Plaintiff:
Nikhil Rahul Dhir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
