Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Robert DiPietro v. Laretha Lockhart
as 22-10609
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT RALPH DIPIETRO
Defendant / Appellee:
LARETHA URETT LOCKHART
Robert DiPietro v. Nina Cooper, et al
as 21-12874
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT RALPH DIPIETRO
Defendant / Appellee:
NINA COOPER, Nurse, MARY TERRY, Nurse, SHANEQUA MUSSA, Chief Counselor and others
Robert DiPietro v. James Barron, et al
as 21-10918
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES F. BARRON, Dentist, DR. SILVER, Psychiatrist, DR. THOMPSON, Psychologist and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT RALPH DIPIETRO
DiPietro v. Agyeri et al
as 1:2020cv02645
Defendant:
Terrell Bond, Charlotte Hall, Tonicia Brandon and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Ralph DiPietro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIPIETRO v. LOCKHART et al
as 4:2020cv00035
Defendant:
FARMER, SHANEQUA MUSSA, LOCKHART and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RALPH DIPIETRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIPIETRO v. COOPER et al
as 4:2019cv00113
Defendant:
NINA COOPER, MUSSA, MARY TERRY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RALPH DIPIETRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIPIETRO v. BARRON et al
as 4:2018cv00179
Defendant:
DR SILVER, DR THOMPSON and JAMES F BARRON
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RALPH DIPIETRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solomon et al v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 8:2018cv02079
Plaintiff:
Cargyle Brown Solomon and Deborah A. Jackson
Defendant:
BWW Law Group, LLC, Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC and Ralph DiPietro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Solomon et al v. Bayview Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 8:2018cv01977
Plaintiff:
Cargyle Brown Solomon and Deborah A. Jackson
Defendant:
BWW Law Group LLC, Ralph DiPietro and Bayview Loan Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DiPietro v. Medical Staff at Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2018cv01036
Plaintiff:
Robert Ralph DiPietro
Defendant:
Medical Staff at Fulton County Jail, Corizon Health Services, George Herron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
