Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Garris v. State Of Maryland
as 1:2013cv00120
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Garris and Garris Family Members
Defendant:
State Of Maryland, Elijah Cummings, Harry Spikes, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Garris et al v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2012cv02373
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Garris, Raymond C. Garris, Mae E. Garris Bradley and others
Defendant:
Governor Martin O'Malley, Lt. Gov Anthony G. Brown, Hon. Douglas F. Gansler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
Garris et al v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2012cv02371
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Garris, Raymond C. Garris, Mae E. Garris Bradley and others
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Anthony G. Brown, Douglas F. Gansler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garris et al v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2012cv02370
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Garris, Raymond C. Garris, Mae E. Garris Bradley and others
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Anthony G. Brown, Douglas F. Gansler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garris et al v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2012cv02372
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Garris, Raymond C. Garris, Mae E. Garris Bradley and others
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Anthony G. Brown, Douglas F. Gansler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jews v. Tyler et al
as 1:2008cv02075
Plaintiff:
William L Jews, William L Jews and William L Jews
Defendant:
Ralph S. Tyler and Carefirst, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv11098
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. The Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City, Maryland et al
as 1:2007cv01023
Plaintiff:
Daniel Earl Smith and Daniel Earl Smith
Defendant:
The Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City, Maryland, Ralph S. Tyler, The Baltimore City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
