General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ralph Lingo v. Warden III, et al
as 15-14471
Petitioner - Appellant: RALPH WILSON LINGO
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN III and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Ralph Wilson v. J.F. Andrew We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-7739
Petitioner - Appellant: RALPH WILSON
Respondent - Appellee: J.F. ANDREWS
Lingo v. Forniss et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2014cv00297
Plaintiff: Ralph Wilson Lingo
Defendant: State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Andrews
as 5:2014hc02041
Petitioner: Ralph Wilson
Respondent: J.F. Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lingo v. Forniss et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00345
Plaintiff: Ralph Wilson Lingo
Defendant: Leon Forniss and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lingo v. Forniss et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00246
Plaintiff: Ralph Wilson Lingo
Defendant: Leon Forniss and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lingo v. Forniss, et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00810
Plaintiff: Ralph Wilson Lingo
Defendant: Leon Forniss and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Bell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv00011
Plaintiff: Ralph Wilson
Defendant: Michael Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lingo v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2008cv00197
Plaintiff: Ralph Wilson Lingo
Defendant: Kenneth Jones and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lingo v. Jones et al (INMATE1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00142
Plaintiff: Ralph Wilson Lingo
Defendant: Kenneth Jones and Troy King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?