Cases 1 - 10 of 267
Ramirez v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
MS. MARIELENA RAMIREZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Henry, III v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Henry, III
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Laurel Harry, George M. Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMIREZ v. ERIE COUNTY PRISON et al
as 1:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
RAMONE RAMIREZ
Defendant:
ERIE COUNTY PRISON, DEPUTY WARDEN HOLMAN and COUNSELOR HEATHER MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
RAMIREZ v. ERIE COUNTY PRISON
as 1:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
RAMONE RAMIREZ
Defendant:
ERIE COUNTY PRISON, MICHAEL HOLLMAN, WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Washington
as 1:2023cv01503
Petitioner:
Andres Leon Ramirez
Respondent:
Warden Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RAMIREZ v. MILLER
as 5:2023cv00820
Plaintiff:
MARIO RAMIREZ
Defendant:
STEVEN MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LENGLE et al v. ESPEJO
as 5:2023cv00697
Plaintiff:
RACHEL LENGLE and TODD LENGLE
Defendant:
PABLO RAMIREZ ESPEJO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Yaksima v. Tuzinski et al
as 3:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Amy Yaksima
Defendant:
Andrew John Tuzinski, Nickloas Basov, Anthony Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
