Cases 1 - 10 of 206
Ramos v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01644
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Ramos
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mitchell v. Strata et al
as 1:2024cv01045
Plaintiff:
Raymon A. Mitchell
Defendant:
Frank Strata, Brandon Watwood, Robert J. Cravens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00860
Plaintiff:
Michael Ramos
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Fitch v. Shaw et al
as 1:2023cv01284
Plaintiff:
Franklin Fitch
Defendant:
Cynthia Shaw, Officer Aimes, Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Mike Ramos
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kumpe et al v. LER Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Angela Kumpe and Jeff Kumpe
Defendant:
LER Transportation, Inc. and Luis Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ramos v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Ramos
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Delmi Ramirez-Ramos, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3827
Petitioner:
DELMI YULIBETH RAMIREZ-RAMOS, JIMMY ISAAC ORTIZ-RAMIREZ and JAHIR DANIEL ORTIZ-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Cerrato et al v. City of Memphis, Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv02602
Plaintiff:
Henry Paz Cerrato, Pedro Gomez, Edgardo Flores Sequeiros and others
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Cerelyn Davis, R. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Victor Guzman-Ramos v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3763
Petitioner:
VICTOR GUZMAN-RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
