Cases 21 - 30 of 1,367
USA v. Medrano-Ramos
as 24-50154
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Aleyda Medrano-Ramos
Espinoza v. Ramos et al
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Lynda Espinoza
Defendant:
Stephen Ramos and The City of San Antonio, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diaz v. Cantu
as 24-50026
Plaintiff:
Enriqueta Diaz
Defendant:
Ramsey Enlish Cantu, Maverick County Judge, Roxanna Rios, Commissioner Precinct 2, Olga Ramos, Commissioner Precinct 3 and others
Ramos v. Jaime et al
as 5:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Sandalio Ramos
Respondent:
Felipe Jaime and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Ramos
as 24-40080
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Deibi Ramos
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Andino-Ramoset al v Mayorkas et al
as 4:2023cv04646
Plaintiff:
DALIA MELISSA ANDINO RAMOS, DONIS MANUEL MATAMOROS GARCIA, Dalia Melissa Andino-Ramos and others
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou and Wallace Carroll
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ramos et al v. Freedom Transport Corp et al
as 6:2023cv01734
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Co, Freedom Transport Corp, Jass Transport Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Ramos, Juana Mendez Ramos and Juana Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Garcia et al v. Ramos et al
as 5:2023cv01508
Plaintiff:
Edgar Garcia, Eric Garcia and April Garcia
Defendant:
Oscar Ramos, Bryan Patten, Juan Carlos-Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
