Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Lester v. Ojo et al
as 5:2023ct03363
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
A. Odu, N. Harris, J. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CABRERA v. USA
as 1:2023cv00129
Petitioner:
JOSE ARMONDO RAMOS CABRERA
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
RAMOS v. ADAMS
as 1:2022cv00960
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANGEL FLOREZ RAMOS
Defendant:
KAREN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodman v. Ramos et al
as 5:2022hc02187
Petitioner:
Jasper Deonta Goodman
Respondent:
Raphael Ramos and Collette S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Butler v. Sullivan et al
as 5:2022ct03341
Plaintiff:
Ricky Butler
Defendant:
Warden Sullivan, Warden Ramos, Captain Fringley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
King v. Ramos
as 5:2022hc02154
Petitioner:
Daniel H. King
Respondent:
Warden R. Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McNeill v. Ramos et al
as 5:2022hc02134
Petitioner:
Demetrios Donell McNeill
Respondent:
Warden R. Ramos and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramos-Andino v. United States of America
as 5:2022hc02133
Petitioner:
Lornie Ariel Ramos-Andino
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
FLORES-RAMOS v. ATRIUM HEALTH
as 1:2022cv00533
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANGEL FLORES-RAMOS
Defendant:
ATRIUM HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
