Cases 11 - 20 of 85
Engstrom v. Holladay et al
as 4:2016cv00588
Plaintiff:
David William Engstrom
Defendant:
Doc Holladay, Randy Morgan, Carl Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant Billings v. Carl Johnson, et al
as 16-2532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bryant Anthony Billings
Defendant - Appellee:
Carl Lynn Johnson, Doctor, Pulaski County Jail (originally named as Johnson), Doc Holladay, Pulaski County Sheriff (originally named as Doc Holiday), Dale Reed, Warden, Malvern Unit ADC and others
McClendon v. Holladay et al
as 4:2015cv00343
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee McClendon
Defendant:
Doc Holladay, Randy Morgan, Sarah Speers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Callahan et al
as 4:2015cv00311
Plaintiff:
Steven Miller
Defendant:
Austin Callahan, Larry Barbee, Doc Holiday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engstrom v. Holladay et al
as 4:2015cv00297
Plaintiff:
David William Engstrom
Defendant:
Doc Holladay, Randy Morgan and Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Starr v. E. Holloman, et al
as 15-1318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Lee Starr
Defendant - Appellee:
E. Holloman, Ex. Sgt. Maximum Security Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction, P. King, CO-1, Maximum Security Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction, Randy Morgan, Warden, Maximum Security Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Allen v. Johnson et al
as 4:2014cv00719
Plaintiff:
Eric Lee Allen
Defendant:
J Johnson, Randy Morgan and Brawley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Villines et al
as 4:2014cv00585
Plaintiff:
Steven Miller
Defendant:
Floyd Villines, Doc Holladay, Randy Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Tally et al
as 4:2014cv00412
Plaintiff:
Eddie Scott, Jr
Defendant:
Tally, Newburn, G Hooker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rushing v. Holiday et al
as 4:2014cv00265
Plaintiff:
Ricky L Rushing
Defendant:
Doc Holiday, Randy Morgan, Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
