Cases 1 - 10 of 219
Rathman et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2023cv06628
Plaintiff:
Barry Rathman and Christine Rathman
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Livermore Auto Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RATHMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv31936
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RATHMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Canada v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02704
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Paul Schnell, Andrew Karlsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Catharine Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05007
Plaintiff:
Lydia Savaglio, Catharine Nichols, Lori Nolen and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00811
Plaintiff:
Nichols, Lydia Savaglio, Catharine Nichols and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00811
Plaintiff:
Lydia Savaglio, Catharine Nichols, Lori Nolen and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Canada v. Antony et al
as 0:2021cv02204
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
Mathias Antony, Olmsted Community of Corrections, Chad Mitch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHOICE v. FLORIDA STATE PRISON et al
as 4:2019cv00435
Defendant:
FLORIDA STATE PRISON and MIKEAL RATHMAN
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and HENRY JAMES CHOICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Israel Santiago-Lugo v. John Rathman
as 19-13069
Petitioner / Appellant:
ISRAEL SANTIAGO-LUGO
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN T. RATHMAN
Gilmore v. Martin County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 0:2019cv01515
Respondent:
Sue Lees, Jeff Marquardt, Martin County Sheriff Dept. and others
Petitioner:
Christopher Gilmore
Defendant:
Debbie Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
