Cases 1 - 10 of 13
LOUIS v. OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2022cv00812
Plaintiff:
MAXWELL LOUIS
Defendant:
OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT, SUSAN LLOYD, KEN NAPAVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOUIS v. OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 5:2022cv00812
Plaintiff:
MAXWELL LOUIS
Defendant:
OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT, SUSAN LLOYD, KEN NAPAVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PIERRE v. KOLODZEIJ et al
as 3:2020cv04786
Defendant:
BASS, J KOLODZEIJ, CENTURY C I MEDICAL OFFICE AND STAFF and others
Plaintiff:
PIERRE A MARCAURAL and MARCAUREL A PIERRE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David S Quair v. Calif. Dept. of Correction and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2020cv00473
Petitioner:
David S Quair, III and Diva Moonchild Quair
Defendant:
C. Radis, P Raught, M Reynoso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quair v. Calif. Dept. of Correction and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2020cv00221
Plaintiff:
David S Quair, III and Diva Moonchild Quair
Defendant:
Calif. Dept. of Correction and Rehabilitation, C. Radis, M. Reynoso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Anthony Aiken v. P. Voegele et al
as 2:2018cv05519
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Aiken
Defendant:
S. Gates, S. Gates, C. Guiang, MD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Harold Hunter v. Paul Gallagher, M.D. et al
as 2:2014cv00711
Defendant:
M. Ancuna, M. Ancuna, C. Barber and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Hunter
Kenneth Moore v. Raught, et al
as 10-56807
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH E. MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
RAUGHT, Correctional Officer and PEMBERTON
Movant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
Idris Nawabi v. D.L. Wyatt et al
as 2:2008cv04385
Defendant:
A. M. Gayfield, J. D. Raught, Lt. J. Steck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
