Cases 1 - 10 of 21
USA v. Horacio Elias
as 21-5680
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HORACIO RAUL ESTRADA ELIAS, aka Horacio Estrada, aka Mario Alberto Estrada-Elias, aka Alberto Mario Estrada-Elias, aka Rudy Horacio Estrada
USA v. Jose Estrada
as 20-50179
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE RAUL ESTRADA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Estrada et al v. Zimmer, Inc et al
as 1:2019cv10615
Plaintiff:
Raul Estrada and Magdalena Estrada
Defendant:
Zimmer US, Inc., Zimmer, Inc, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. f/k/a Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
In re: Horacio Elias
as 19-5547
Petitioner:
In re: HORACIO RAUL ESTRADA ELIAS, aka Horacio Estrada, aka Mario Alberto Estrada-elias, aka Alberto Mario Estrada-elias, aka Rudy Horacio Estrada
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Estrada et al v. Metropolitan Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas
as 5:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
Raul Estrada and Norma Estrada
Defendant:
Metropolitan Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estrada Rodriguez et al v. Bletcher et al
as 3:2016cv00381
Defendant:
Robert Bletcher and Steven Reseigne
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Cervantes Martinez, Raul Estrada Rodriguez, Jose Manuel Mejia and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Horacio Elia
as 15-6438
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HORACIO RAUL ESTRADA ELIAS, aka Horacio Estrada, aka Mario Alberto Estrada-elias, aka Alberto Mario Estrada-elias, aka Rudy Horacio Estrada
Lnu v. USA
as 6:2015cv07398
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Horacio Raul Estrada Elias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Estrada v. Janecka, et al
as 15-2021
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAUL ESTRADA
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES JANECKA and GARY K. KING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
