Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Long v. Ravago Americas, LLC
as 6:2021cv01649
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Long
Defendant:
Ravago Americas LLC and Ravago Americas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Premier Polymers, LLC et al v. Wilson et al
as 1:2021cv02162
Defendant:
Ravago Americas, LLC and Scott Wilson
Plaintiff:
Vinmar Polymers America, LLC and Premier Polymers, LLC
In Re: Subpoena to Google, LLC
as 5:2021mc80064
In Re:
Google LLC
Defendant:
Jeffrey Scott Siebenaller
Plaintiff:
Ravago America's LLC
Federal Insurance Company v. Ravago Americas LLC
as 1:2020cv10071
Plaintiff:
Federal Insurance Company
Defendant:
Ravago Americas LLC and Ravago Americas LLC doing business as Amco Polymers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gross et al v. Derhagopian
as 6:2020cv02185
Plaintiff:
Felicia Gross and Kenneth Gross
Petitioner:
Ravago Americas LLC
Defendant:
David Derhagopian
Advanced Cable Ties, Inc. v. Ravago Americas LLC et al
as 4:2020cv11881
Defendant:
Ravago Holdings America, Inc. and Ravago Americas LLC
Plaintiff:
Advanced Cable Ties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Advanced Cable Ties, Inc. v. Ravago Americas LLC et al
as 1:2020cv11881
Defendant:
Ravago Holdings America, Inc. and Ravago Americas LLC
Plaintiff:
Advanced Cable Ties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAVAGO AMERICAS LLC et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv01495
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
RAVAGO AMERICAS LLC, HB CHEMICAL CORPORATION, INTERNATIONAL POLYMERS CORPORATION and others
Interested Party:
RAVAGO HOLDINGS AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
