Cases 1 - 10 of 13
BARRETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09602
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA RAY BARRETT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barrett v. United States of America
as 3:2014cv02485
Petitioner:
Danny Ray Barrett
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barrett v. Grady County Law Enforcement Center
as 5:2014cv00021
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ray Barrett
Defendant:
Grady County Law Enforcement Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Danny Barrett
as 12-10937
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANNY RAY BARRETT, also known as Daniel Barrett
United States of America v. Barrett
as 3:2011cv01789
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Danny Ray Barrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Barrett v. USA
as 3:2011cv00133
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Danny Ray Barrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Barrett v. Stanfield
as 3:2010cv00439
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Barrett
Defendant:
Percy Stanfield, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Danny Barrett
as 09-10937
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANNY RAY BARRETT
Terrence Johnson, et al v. Phil Bredesen, et al
as 08-6377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRENCE JOHNSON, JIM HARRIS, ALEXANDER FRIEDMAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PHIL BREDESEN, Governor of the State of Tennessee, BROOK THOMPSON, Coordinator of Elections, RILEY DARNELL, Secretary of State of Tennessee and others
Amicus Curiae:
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT NYU SCHOOL OF LAW
Johnson et al v. Bredesen et al
as 3:2008cv00187
Plaintiff:
Terrence Johnson, Terrence Johnson, Terrence Johnson and others
Defendant:
Phil Bredesen, Brook Thompson, Riley Darnell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
