Cases 1 - 10 of 11
EVANS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14098
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP RAY EVANS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
EVANS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv25697
Plaintiff:
DONALD RAY EVANS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv40902
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON RAY EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv38426
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ISAAC RAY EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10178
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Donnie Ray Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Evans v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00342
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Evans
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv08844
Plaintiff:
Barbara Schechinger Evans and Michael Ray Evans
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
EVANS et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv66724
Plaintiff:
DON RAY EVANS and SANDRA EVANS
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS v. THE CELOTEX CORP.
as 2:2011cv65978
Plaintiff:
DON RAY EVANS
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS et al v. AQUA CHEM INC. et al
as 2:2009cv62623
Plaintiff:
EDDIE RAY EVANS and RUBY B. EVANS
Defendant:
AQUA CHEM INC., BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
