Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Newton v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Newton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Donald Newton, Jr. v. USA
as 21-13804
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONALD RAY NEWTON, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00254
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Cox v. Rakes et al
as 3:2019cv00228
Defendant:
Christopher M. Rakes, Ray Gardener, KY State Police and others
Plaintiff:
Lucy Hardesty, Rodger Lee Cox and Alexander Blake Roby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley et al v. German Pellets Texas LLC
as 1:2017cv00494
Defendant:
German Pellets Texas LLC , Cotton Commercial USA Inc. and Texas Pellets, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hilton Kelley , Lydia Kelley, Shenetta Alexander and others
Petitioner:
Leonard Jowan Francis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Gomez v. Newton et al
as 2:2017cv00373
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Gomez
Defendant:
L & N Trasportation and Kenith Ray Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brown v. Newton et al
as 1:2013cv00288
Plaintiff:
Jason B Brown
Defendant:
Larry Ray Newton and Tony Lennartz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brock v. Newton et al
as 1:2012cv00095
Plaintiff:
Vince Brock
Defendant:
Larry Ray Newton, Jr, Robert Bicknell, Nathan Keever and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beiler v. Dunkirk Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv00002
Defendant:
Dunkirk Police Department, Michael E Kreps, Brad Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Bret S Beiler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beiler v. Jay County Sheriff Office
as 1:2011cv00380
Plaintiff:
Bret S Beiler
Defendant:
Jay County Sheriff Office, Jay County Security Center, Jay County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
