Cases 1 - 10 of 1,448
Crawford v. Smith
as 1:2024cv03447
Plaintiff:
Kristyn Crawford
Defendant:
Raymond Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
SAMS v. PRETORIOUS
as 2:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
RAYMOND D. SAMS
Respondent:
TRICIA PRETORIOUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Serrecchia v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00944
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Raymond Serrecchia
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Higgs v. Urbanski et al
as 1:2024cv02252
Plaintiff:
Jayden Higgs
Defendant:
Raymond Urbanski, Roger Farias, Gabriel Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Howard Raymond Green, Jr. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv02233
Plaintiff:
Howard Raymond Green, Jr.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Marilyn Eason v. Michael Casper, et al
as 24-1424
Plaintiff:
MARILYN EASON
Defendant:
MICHAEL T. CASPER and RAYMOND FRANCO
Behrens v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Raymond E Behrens
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc. and General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Raymond Jones v. Cheryl Eplett
as 24-1398
Applicant:
RAYMOND JONES
Respondent:
CHERYL EPLETT, Warden
Gonzalez v. Ibrahim et al
as 3:2024cv00715
Plaintiff:
Maria Gonzalez
Defendant:
Abdikadir A. Ibrahim, MZ Cargo, Inc., Greyhound Lines, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
