Cases 1 - 7 of 7
JOHNSON v. USA
as 1:2016cv00916
Petitioner:
RAYMOND CRAIG JOHNSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2015cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2013cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2011cv00391
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Johnson
Defendant:
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. , C. Matthew Keen , Shera K. Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Johnson v. Hendrick Automotive Group et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2011cv00389
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Johnson
Defendant:
Hendrick Automotive Group and Hendrick Honda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2010cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2006cv00148
Plaintiff:
Raymond S. Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.