Cases 1 - 10 of 15
(HC) Watkins v. Tuolumne County Superior Court et al
as 1:2023cv01516
Petitioner:
Raymond C. Watkins
Respondent:
Tuolumne County Superior Court and Tuolumne County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC)Watkins v. Tuolumne County Superior Court
as 1:2023cv01450
Petitioner:
Raymond C. Watkins
Respondent:
Tuolumne County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Watkins v. Tuolumne Co Sheriff et al
as 1:2023cv01430
Plaintiff:
Raymond C. Watkins
Defendant:
Tuolumne Co Sheriff, Tuolumne Co Sheriff Dept Custody Division, Tuolumne Co Behavioral Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. State of California
as 4:2018cv07496
Petitioner:
Raymond C Watkins
Defendant:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01656
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Watkins v. Tuolumne County Jail
as 1:2018cv01426
Defendant:
Tuolumne County Jail
Plaintiff:
Raymond C. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Watkins v. Tuolumne County Jail, et al.
as 1:2018cv01412
Defendant:
Jail Commander, Staff Sargent and Tuolumne CountyJail
Plaintiff:
Raymond C. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. High Roller Incorporated et al
as 1:2018cv01411
Defendant:
Sonora Burger King and High Roller Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Raymond C. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
(PC) Watkins v. Tuolumne County Jail et al
as 1:2018cv01385
Defendant:
Richards, Tuolumne County Jail, Teague and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond C. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Watkins v. Tuolumne County
as 1:2018cv01226
Defendant:
Tuolumne County
Plaintiff:
Raymond C. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.