Cases 1 - 10 of 12
NORTH AMERICAN COMPANY FOR LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE v. LONG
as 2:2020cv06456
Defendant:
RAYMOND LONG
Plaintiff:
NORTH AMERICAN COMPANY FOR LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raymond Long, et al v. Tammy Dorset, et al
as 20-15036
Defendant / Appellee:
TAMMY DORSET and FACEBOOK, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND LONG and BANDHA YOGA PUBLICATIONS, LLC
Long et al v. NCL BAHAMAS, LTD.
as 1:2019cv24314
Defendant:
NCL BAHAMAS, LTD. and NCL BAHAMAS, LTD. a Bermuda Company doing business as Norwegian Cruise Lines(NCL)
Plaintiff:
Lisa Long and Raymond Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Long, M.D. et al v. Issuu Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv10228
Plaintiff:
Raymond Long, M.D. and Bandha Yoga Publications, LLC
Defendant:
Issuu Inc. , John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
USA v. Raymond Long
as 17-56859
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND CHARLES LONG, AKA Green Eyes, AKA Raymond Long
Long M.D. et al v. Amazon. Com, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv08499
Plaintiff:
Raymond Long, M.D. and Bandha Yoga Publications, LLC
Defendant:
Amazon. Com, Inc., John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Long, M.D. et al v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv08502
Plaintiff:
Raymond Long, M.D. and Bandha Yoga Publications, LLC
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc. , John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Long et al v. Dorset
as 4:2017cv02758
Plaintiff:
Raymond Long and Bandha Yoga Publications, LLC
Defendant:
Tammy Dorset
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Long v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
as 1:2011cv05440
Plaintiff:
Raymond Long
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
USA v. Raymond Long
as 09-50132
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAYMOND CHARLES LONG, AKA Raymond Long, AKA Green Eyes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
