Cases 81 - 90 of 436
Arconic, Inc., et al v. APC Investment Co., et al
as 19-55181
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, FIRST DICE ROAD COMPANY, INC., POWERINE OIL COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PILKINGTON GROUP LIMITED, CALIFORNIA HYDROFORMING COMPANY, INC., ARLON, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RAYTHEON COMPANY v. REBARICK
as 1:2018mc00172
Defendant:
WILLIAM REBARICK
Plaintiff:
RAYTHEON COMPANY
Petitioner:
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00630
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Virtual Immersion Technologies LLC v. Raytheon Company
as 1:2018cv01352
Defendant:
Raytheon Company
Plaintiff:
Virtual Immersion Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Raytheon Company v. Rebarick
as 6:2018cv01308
Defendant:
William Rebarick
Plaintiff:
Raytheon Company
Petitioner:
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Raytheon Company v. NCR Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv02402
Defendant:
NCR Corporation, Maurice J. Edwards, III and CECO, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Raytheon Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Alicea v. Raytheon Company
as 1:2018cv11572
Defendant:
Raytheon Company
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Alicea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RUSSO et al v. AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03024
Defendant:
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC., EATON ELECTRICAL, INC., GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO. and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK C. RUSSO and HANNAH RUSSO
Counter Defendant:
DOW SILICONES CORPORATION and GOULD ELECTRONICS, INC.
Respondent:
ABB, INC.
Petitioner:
COOPER INDUSTRIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-55930
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
