Cases 1 - 10 of 11
NEIMEISTER v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 1:2021cv06097
Defendant:
READING TRUCK BODY, LLC and FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Plaintiff:
BRETT NEIMEISTER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Gichner et al v. Arvinmeritor, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01071
Plaintiff:
David Gichner and Carol Gichner
Defendant:
Arvinmeritor, Inc. , Borg-Warner Morse Tec LLC , Carlisle Companies Incorporated and others
Cross_claimant:
DCo LLC and Eaton Corporation
Cross_defendant:
DCo LLC , Arvinmeritor, Inc. , Borg-Warner Morse Tec LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv05782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Black v. The Reading Group, LLC et al
as 8:2012cv01956
Plaintiff:
Tammy and Jimmy Black
Defendant:
The Reading Group, LLC , Reading Truck Body, LLC , Reading Equipment & Distribution, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv05588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Worktrux, LLC et al v. Reading Truck Body, LLC
as 2:2009cv01494
Plaintiff:
Worktrux, LLC and Harold R Wells, Jr
Defendant:
Reading Truck Body, LLC and Reading Truck Body, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Reading Truck Body, LLC v. Worktrux, LLC
as 2:2009cv01467
Plaintiff:
Reading Truck Body, LLC
Defendant:
Worktrux, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv02607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
