Cases 1 - 10 of 1,000
Hatton v. Southwest Recovery Services LLC
as 5:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Hatton
Defendant:
Southwest Recovery Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Reo Covington v. William Chronister, et al
as 24-1906
Plaintiff:
Reo L. Covington
Defendant:
William Chronister, Dardenelle Police Officer, Does, 1-4, Dardenelle Police Officers, Pearson's Towing & Recovery Services LLC, Towing Services and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
EICHLIN v. GHK COMPANY et al
as 5:2024cv01502
Plaintiff:
TINA EICHLIN
Defendant:
GHK COMPANY doing business as KELLY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP and COMMONWEALTH ASSET RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cox v. Sholar et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Valencia Cox
Defendant:
Walt Sholar doing business as Bullitt County Sheriff, Dylan Curran doing business as Bullitt County Deputy Sheriff, Troy John doing business as Bullitt County Sheriff Sergeant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
