Cases 1 - 10 of 37
RampWerks, LLC v. Recreational Equipment, Inc. (d/b/a REI)
as 2:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
RampWerks, LLC
Defendant:
Recreational Equipment, Inc. (d/b/a REI)
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Brandon Wade Photography LLC v. Recreational Equipment Inc
as 3:2023cv05411
Plaintiff:
Brandon Wade Photography, LLC and Brandon Wade Photography LLC
Defendant:
Recreational Equipment, Inc. and Recreational Equipment Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
RECOG IP LLC v. Recreational Equipment, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00257
Plaintiff:
RECOG IP LLC
Defendant:
Recreational Equipment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hitel Technologies LLC v. Recreational Equipment, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Hitel Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Recreational Equipment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Push Data LLC v. Recreational Equipment, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00783
Defendant:
Recreational Equipment, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Push Data LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Hong v. Recreational Equipment Inc et al
as 4:2019cv00435
Plaintiff:
Tony Hong
Defendant:
Samuel Krieg, Does 1-10 and Recreational Equipment Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Hong v. Recreational Equipment Inc et al
as 2:2019cv00951
Plaintiff:
Tony Hong
Defendant:
Samuel Krieg, Recreational Equipment Inc and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Tony Hong v. Recreational Equipment, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv08519
Plaintiff:
Tony Hong
Defendant:
Recreational Equipment, Inc., Samuel Krieg, Krieg Climbing Cycling and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Encoditech LLC v. Recreational Equipment, Inc.
as 6:2017cv00358
Plaintiff:
Encoditech LLC
Defendant:
Recreational Equipment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
eCeipt LLC v. Recreational Equipment Inc
as 2:2016cv01112
Plaintiff:
eCeipt LLC
Defendant:
Recreational Equipment Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
