Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Stewart, Timothy v. Arndt, Jim et al
as 3:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Stewart, Sr.
Defendant:
Jim Arndt, Arndt, Investments, L.L.C., All Jane/John Doe Employees/Owners of Arndt, Investments, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wigginton v. City Of Belvidere et al
as 3:2023cv50171
Plaintiff:
Beverly Wigginton, Richard Wigginton, T.L.W. et. al. and others
Defendant:
City Of Belvidere, Belvidere Police Department, K.C. Brox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart, Timothy v. Reese et al
as 3:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Stewart, Sr.
Defendant:
Officer (J.P.D.) Reese, John Doe, Andrew P. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Reese v. Krones Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01382
Plaintiff:
Michael F Reese, Sr
Defendant:
Krones Inc, Mark Doolittle, John Barker and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
WALKER v. NOWASKOWSKI et al
as 1:2021cv02291
Plaintiff:
DONALD R. WALKER
Defendant:
RICHARD R. NOWASKOWSKI, MARK R. STETZEL, JENNIFER K. BARTEK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp
Stubblefield v. Reese et al
as 1:2021cv02289
Plaintiff:
Jared Stubblefield
Defendant:
Ryan Reese and Kimberly M Foxx
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill Todd v. Michael Reese Hospital
as 1:2019cv02898
Defendant:
Michael Reese Hospital
Plaintiff:
Ethel Lee Hill Todd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
