Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Reese v. Spaulding
as 1:2018cv11235
Petitioner:
Troy Reese
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fulton, Jr v. Worcester County Sheriff Office et al
as 4:2018cv40022
Plaintiff:
Albert Fulton, Jr, III
Defendant:
Worcester County Sheriff Office, Lewis Evangelidis, David Tuttle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lietzke v. County of Montgomery et al
as 1:2017cv11649
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
County of Montgomery, Reese McKinney and D.T Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LIETZKE v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2017cv00329
Plaintiff:
BILL LIETZKE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, REESE MCKINNEY and DT MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Davies Innovations Inc v. Sig Sauer Inc
as 1:2016cv00352
Plaintiff:
Davies Innovations Inc
Defendant:
Sig Sauer Inc.
Unknown:
William Reese Jones and Bruce Charles Morris
Interested Party:
Sturm Ruger & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
WM Capital Partners 51, LLC. v. Johnson-Ramos et al
as 3:2016cv01823
Defendant:
Reese Melvin Johnson-Ramos, Carmen Delia Perea-Cruz and Conjugal Partnership Johnson-Perea
Plaintiff:
WM Capital Partners 51, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Davis v. Foley et al
as 4:2016cv10419
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
Foley, Maureen Hatch, C. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reese v. Bouffard, et al
as 15-1683
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEOFFREY DEMOND REESE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT BOUFFARD, MIKE TAUSEK, TONY MENDEZ and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH PONTE and PATRICIA BARNHART
Reese v. State of Maine
as 15-1189
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEOFFREY DEMOND REESE
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF MAINE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
