Cases 21 - 30 of 37
REESE v. STATE OF MAINE
as 1:2014cv00344
Petitioner:
GEOFFREY DEMOND REESE
Respondent:
STATE OF MAINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Overka, et al v. American Airlines, Inc.
as 14-1869
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAURENCE ALLSOP, and all others similarly situated, DEREK BASZKIEWICZ, and all others similarly situated, MARCAUREL BENNETT, and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff:
OMAR JOHN REESE, and all others similarly situated and MICHAEL MAHONEY, and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
REESE v. BOUFFARD et al
as 1:2014cv00244
Plaintiff:
GEOFFREY REESE
Defendant:
ROBERT BOUFFARD, MIKE TAUSEK, TONY MENDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Student v. Erlichman et al
as 1:2014cv12013
Plaintiff:
Student
Defendant:
Reese Erlichman and Quincy Public Schools
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gordan et al v. Mass Mutual Life Insurance Co. et al
as 3:2013cv30184
Plaintiff:
Dennis Gordan , John Hine , Donna Flieger and others
Defendant:
Mass Mutual Life Insurance Co. , Roger Crandall, Stuart H. Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
REESE v. BOUFFARD
as 1:2013cv00077
Petitioner:
OLLAND REESE
Respondent:
RODNEY BOUFFARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Matesanz
as 10-1424
Petitioner:
REESE WILLIAMS, a/k/a Omar H. Abdur Rahim
Respondent:
JAMES MATESANZ
Overka, et al v. American Airlines, Inc.
as 10-8004
Plaintiff - Respondent:
DARYL OVERKA, DEREK BASZKIEWICZ, KEVIN CORRIGAN and others
Plaintiff:
OMAR JOHN REESE and MICHAEL MAHONEY
Defendant - Petitioner:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
Reese-Thomas v. US, et al
as 09-1884
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER E. REESE-THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES and CAROLYN A. SABOL, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
