Cases 31 - 40 of 234
Burrus v. Rishel et al
as 1:2017cv00109
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Burrus
Defendant:
Glen Rishel, Dana Christensen, Damon Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reese v. Collier
as 4:2017cv00843
Petitioner:
Roderick L Reese
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Powers v. M.T.C. et al
as 5:2017cv00026
Plaintiff:
Michael Powers
Defendant:
M.T.C., Jody Bradley, Larry Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig v. Bradley et al
as 5:2017cv00023
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Craig
Defendant:
J. Bradley, G. Walker, Unknown Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reese v. Collier
as 4:2017cv00217
Plaintiff:
Roderick L Reese
Defendant:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reese v. Collier
as 3:2017cv00181
Petitioner:
Roderick L Reese
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reese v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2017cv00038
Petitioner:
Scotty Lynn Reese
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jeremy Reese v. Stafeny Shearwood, et al
as 16-11352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY DALE REESE, also known as Monster
Defendant - Appellee:
STAFENY SHEARWOOD, Head Nurse, Tom Green County Jail, Individual and Official Capacity, THOMAS FREEDEN, Doctor, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Individual and Official Capacity, SANDRA LNU, Case Manager, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Reese v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00545
Plaintiff:
David Reese
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Livingston et al
as 6:2016cv00242
Plaintiff:
Artavias T Edwards
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Bennie J Coleman, Rebecca A Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
