Cases 31 - 40 of 47
REESE v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2011cv01155
Petitioner:
LOUIS REESE
Respondent:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATES OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CHURCH OF UNIVERSAL LOVE AND MUSIC et al v. FAYETTE COUNTY et al
as 2:2010cv01422
Plaintiff:
CHURCH OF UNIVERSAL LOVE AND MUSIC , WILLIAM D. PRITTS , ANTHONY PRITTS and others
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY, FAYETTE COUNTY DRUG TASK FORCE, MARK BROOKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BUSHANSKY v. SUPERIOR WELL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv01121
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BUSHANSKY
Defendant:
SUPERIOR WELL SERVICES, INC., DAVID E. WALLACE, ANTHONY J. MENDICINO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
LYNN v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2010cv00040
Plaintiff:
BOBBY LEE LYNN
Defendant:
KENNETH R. CAMERON, JAMEY P. LUTHER, MRS. MORRIS HOUSER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERA v. PA DEP'T OF CORRS. et al
as 2:2009cv01604
Plaintiff:
FRANK RIVERA
Defendant:
PA DEP'T OF CORRS., JEFFREY A. BEARD, LOUIS S. FOLINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
REESE v. USA
as 2:2009cv00709
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DEON REESE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
REESE v. BARONE et al
as 2:2009cv00307
Petitioner:
EMMITT REESE
Respondent:
MICHAEL C. BARONE and PA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
EMIGH v. STEFFEE et al
as 2:2008cv01726
Plaintiff:
GEORGE F. EMIGH
Defendant:
SUSANNE STEFFEE, JEFFREY MILLER, ALLISON JACOBS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LOPEZ v. GRAINEY et al
as 2:2008cv01342
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ
Defendant:
DAVID GRAINEY, V. SANTOYO, PAUL PALYA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
