Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01686
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01455
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
White et al v. Reeves et al
as 1:2020cv00412
Plaintiff:
Applied Extracts, Inc. and James White
Defendant:
Bradley Reeves, Oregon Hemp Tea Company, L.L.C. and Oregon Drying Technologies, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Committe v. AACSB International et al
as 3:2020cv00372
Defendant:
Susan Capalbo, Board of Trustees of Oregon State University, AACSB International and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Committe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Reeves v. Laney
as 6:2019cv01131
Defendant:
Garrett Laney
Petitioner:
Benjie Allen Reeves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fesser v. West Linn Police Department et al
as 3:2018cv01516
Defendant:
West Linn Police Department, Terry Timeus, Mike Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Fesser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Reeves v. Oregon Department of Corrections, et al
as 6:2018cv01471
Defendant:
Steve Shelton, Reed Paulson, Oregon Department of Corrections, an agency of the State of Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
Williams Reeves and William Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schrock et al v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2018cv01264
Plaintiff:
Duane Michael Schrock and Julie Kaye Embry
Defendant:
JR Johnson, Douglas E. Woodcock, State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Reeves v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
as 3:2017cv01674
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Plaintiff:
Jerry C. Reeves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
