Cases 1 - 10 of 14
JOHNSON v. SEASHORE ASPHALT CORP. et al
as 2:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
REGINALD JOHNSON
Defendant:
SEASHORE ASPHALT CORP. and JAMES GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
IN RE: REGINALD JOHNSON
as 2:2023cv03966
Petitioner:
REGINALD JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON et al v. DETECTIVE JOHN DOE et al
as 2:2013cv02743
Plaintiff:
C. REGINALD JOHNSON and JAMES ALTON STEPHENS
Defendant:
DETECTIVE JOHN DOE, POLICE OFFICER JOHN/JANE DOE I, POLICE OFFICER JOHN/JANE DOE II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. McVey
as 4:2013cv01244
Plaintiff:
Reginald Johnson
Defendant:
Catherine C. McVey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 4:2012cv02588
Plaintiff:
Reginald Johnson
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Lycoming Co. District Attorney's Office and Kenneth A. Osokow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv05786
Plaintiff:
REGINALD JOHNSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
KAPP et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv04575
Plaintiff:
JOE KAPP , PAUL LOWE , CRAIG COTTON and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES LLC , RIDDELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Rozum et al
as 4:2010cv02533
Petitioner:
Reginald Johnson
Respondent:
Superintendent Rozum and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MACKEL
as 3:2008cv00210
Plaintiff:
REGINALD JOHNSON
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MACKEL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JOHNSON v. BEARD et al
as 3:2008cv00096
Plaintiff:
REGINALD JOHNSON
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, CARL HOFFMAN and CAROL COLBURN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
