Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Howell v. Leahy, et al
as 23-1995
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN LEAHY, Mayor of Lowell, SOKHARY CHAU, Mayor of Lowell, RICHARD CESARZ, Lowell Police Officer and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM SAMARAS, City of Council, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, LOWELL, MA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01571
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Howell v. Leahy, et al
as 23-1647
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN LEAHY, Mayor of Lowell, SOKHARY CHAU, Mayor of Lowell, RICHARD CESARZ, Lowell Police Officer and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM SAMARAS, City of Council, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, LOWELL, MA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3660
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act
Howell v. Lowell Regional Transit Authority
as 23-1514
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
LOWELL REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-35394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Phillips v. Tampa Police Department et al
as 8:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
Charity L. Phillips
Defendant:
Tampa Police Department and Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
