Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Watts v. Remington, et al.
as 2:2017cv00399
Plaintiff:
Eric Watts
Defendant:
Cal Remington, Douglas Spencer and San Mateo County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Remington v. Myrick et al
as 2:2016cv01993
Defendant:
Lt. Cam A. Bauer, C.O. Lavelle Braun, Capt. Larry P. Lytle and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Remington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McAdams v. Penrose et al
as 4:2016cv05133
Plaintiff:
Grant Thomas McAdams
Defendant:
Gina Penrose , Andrew Remington , Michael True and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fricano v Lane County, et al
as 6:2016cv01339
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc., Lucy Kingsley, Lane County and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo James Fricano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farhed Fred Hafezi v. Calvin Remington
as 2:2016cv03374
Petitioner:
Farhed Fred Hafezi
Respondent:
Calvin Remington
Charles Boyd et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2014cv00336
Defendant:
Access Securepak, Alverez, Amador and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Boyd, John Brown, Robert Castro and others
Blythe, Indio, RPDC, Smith, SWBC:
Riverside County Jail System
Robert Alarcia v. Calvin Remington, et al
as 10-56610
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT ALARCIA
Respondent - Appellee:
CALVIN REMINGTON, Acting Chief Probation Officer Los Angeles County Probation Department and MICHAEL SANCHEZ, Deputy Probation Officer
Harmon v. Mack et al
as 5:2010cv04053
Plaintiff:
Tyshon Maleke Harmon
Defendant:
Richard Mack, Robert Bowman, R. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeBeaux v. Dennehy
as 2:2010cv01214
Plaintiff:
Remington Donavair LeBeaux
Defendant:
Bernie Dennehy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeBeaux v. Seattle Police Department Arresting Officers et al
as 2:2010cv01015
Plaintiff:
Remington Donavair LeBeaux
Defendant:
Seattle Police Department Arresting Officers and Booking Officers KCDAJD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
