Cases 1 - 10 of 11
REMINGTON v. NC DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY et al.
as 1:2022cv00557
Plaintiff:
MARIA S. REMINGTON
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY and PRYOR GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHOWS V. WILKINS, ET AL.
as 1:2017cv00568
Defendant:
ANDREW CHARLES WILKINS , ASHFORD TRS SAPPHIRE VI LLC and REMINGTON HOTELS, LLC
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS C. SHOWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KUHNEN v. REMINGTON et al
as 1:2015cv00766
Plaintiff:
SCOTT KUHNEN
Defendant:
DARREN REMINGTON, SUSANNE GANN, JANET VROTSOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TICKLE v. USA
as 1:2015cv00263
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
CHASE REMINGTON TICKLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WILLIAMS, ET AL v. REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, LLC.
as 1:2014cv01084
Plaintiff:
JOI WILLIAMS and FLOYD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, LLC. et al v. FNH USA, LLC
as 1:2014cv00399
Plaintiff:
REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, LLC. and CADEX, INC.
Defendant:
FNH USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
YANCEY v. REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00477
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM S. YANCEY
Defendant:
REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, LLC. and AMMUNITION ACCESSORIES INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
HENDERSON v. REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00437
Plaintiff:
DAVID C HENDERSON
Defendant:
REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY LLC and CASCADE CARTRIDGE INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
MAXWELL v. REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2010cv00918
Plaintiff:
RONNIE MAXWELL
Defendant:
REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
TEXAS HOME TEAM, INC. et al v. U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC.
as 1:2009cv00556
Plaintiff:
TEXAS HOME TEAM, INC., REMINGTON GRILL OF CARY, INC., REMINGTON GRILL OF LOUISBURG, INC. and others
Defendant:
U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
