Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Yaeger v. Lively et al
as 8:2018cv02474
Defendant:
Michael Lawry, Hillsborough County Sheriff Office, Bradley Ryan Lively and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Yaeger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shabe v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv02217
Plaintiff:
Therese Shabe
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc., Renaissance Hotel Mgmt Co. LLC, Ritz Carlton Hotel Co, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv00988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Gilmore v. State of Georgia Court et al
as 1:2012cv03806
Plaintiff:
Henry C. Gilmore
Defendant:
State of Georgia Court, Mark Butler and Residence Inn
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company et al v. A&H Sales, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00629
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company and Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
A&H Sales, Inc., Hollis & Spann, Inc., Larry Blumberg & Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jones et al v. Residence Inn et al
as 1:2010cv02864
Plaintiff:
Joynessa Jones, Yvonne Allen, Gary Lynn and others
Defendant:
Residence Inn , Marriott International Inc. , Sabrina Ware and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
