Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017at00610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WILLIAMS vs MISSISSIPPI VALLEY EDIBLE OIL REFINING COMPANY INC
as 3:2016cv00266
Plaintiff:
DAVID RODGER WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RESTAURANT TECHNOLOGIES INC , CHART INDUSTRIES INC , JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00859
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EAD v. RESTAURANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
as 2:2015cv02682
Plaintiff:
MERVAT EAD
Defendant:
RESTAURANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Scott et al v. Restaurant Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2014cv12614
Plaintiff:
Joseph Scott and Rydan Park Master Trust
Defendant:
Restaurant Technologies, Inc.
Thirdparty_defendant:
Atkinson Carpet Installation Company, Inc., IBA Molecular North America, Inc. and European Quarry Imports, LLC
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Restaurant Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
MOAK v. RESTAURANT TECHNOLOGIES INC
as 3:2013cv00117
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE L MOAK
Defendant:
RESTAURANT TECHNOLOGIES INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
