Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States of America v. Mendez (Matos)
as 22-1561
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Luis Mendez, Hector Santiago, Helbert Calo-Birriel, AKA Helbert Calo-Birreiel and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Samuel Matos
Resto v. Joseph
as 20-2214
Respondent / Appellee:
Joseph Joseph, Superintendent, Bedford Hills Correctional Facility
Petitioner / Appellant:
Iris Resto
DS et al v Rochester City School District et al
as 6:2019cv06528
Plaintiff:
R. Brian Goewey, CS and DS
Defendant:
Kim Garlock, Nancy Resto, Nicole McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kowlessar v. Resto et al
as 1:2019cv03324
Defendant:
Luck Resto and DI Trucking LLC
Plaintiff:
Wesley Kowlessar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Gjekaj et al v. Shorehaven Homeowners Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00817
Plaintiff:
Brandon Resto and Christopher Gjekaj
Defendant:
Shorehaven Homeowners Association, Inc., Vernon Alcoser, Will Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Appel et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11433
Plaintiff:
Moira Horan, Peter McNamara, Margaret McCormick and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Resto-Otero v.Auburn Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2018cv00824
Plaintiff:
Michael Resto-Otero
Defendant:
N.Y.S. DOCCS Auburn Correctional Facility, NYS DOCCS and Auburn Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00642
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Barno v. Barno et al
as 3:2018cv00470
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Barno
Defendant:
Lorraine D Barno, John O'Leary, Rebecca A Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
