Cases 11 - 20 of 202
David Gamboa v. Banuelos et al
as 2:2023cv08959
Plaintiff:
David Gamboa
Defendant:
Banuelos, Munoz, Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coronado v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2023cv08571
Plaintiff:
Ever Antonio Alvarado Coronado
Defendant:
Alejandro N Mayorkas and Nicanor Guridi Reynoso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
(PC) Gamboa v. Banuelos et al
as 1:2023cv01397
Plaintiff:
David Gamboa
Defendant:
Banuelos, Munoz, Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynoso Ortega v. USA
as 1:2023cv05502
Plaintiff:
Junior Rafael Reynoso Ortega
Defendant:
United State of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ismail Mora v. Sheree Williams et al
as 5:2022cv02267
Plaintiff:
Ismail Mora
Defendant:
Sheree Williams, Zachery Reynoso, Mr. Placito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman K. Young v. M. Grijalva et al
as 2:2022cv07155
Plaintiff:
Norman Keith Young
Defendant:
M. Grijalva, K. McQuaid, R. McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ibbison v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01163
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Ibbison
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Rodriguez, Mr. Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mackey v. Bloomfield et al
as 3:2022cv05105
Plaintiff:
Vincent Robert Mackey
Defendant:
Robert Bloomfield, Sgt. Baker, Lt. Teixiera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez-Reynoso v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00167
Petitioner:
Agustin Nunez-Reynoso
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nunez-Reynoso v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2022cv00144
Petitioner:
Agustin Nunez-Reynoso
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
